If you were stressed out, or running late, or even if you had a sick family member, you might be able to have a defense. This means that in these situations, you might be able to talk about the reasons behind why you were guilty. These are defenses for speeding in which you talk about the fact that you are actually guilty, but that you had a reason for it. this means that if you can explain the rationale for the speeding, and there is just cause for doing so, then there is a case for a lesser punishment.  In order to prove this type of reason, you need to go to court and plead your case. This is not something that you can do if you pay a fixed penalty notice. At the end of the day, the best you can do is plead your case with honesty and emotion – whether the court believes there are sufficient grounds is based on the validity of your argument. It not often that the court will believe you had any reason to speed, and break the law, as this sets a precedent for others to follow.

When it come to the court, arguments about other drivers being the reason for your speeding are not usually arguments that hold up. Using th excuse that another vehicle was driving so close that you were forced to speed up is not a valid argument in court. Therefore, this usually will not hold up in court. There are, of course, some exceptions. if you can prove that you had to speed for your own safety, or for another persons, this may be grounds for the court to be lenient on you.

If your argument is that you were caught speeding in a 30 mph zone, and you did not see a sign for that zone, and it was not a clearly residential area, you might feel that you have an argument. However, there is no law that states a 30 mph speed limit must be posted. It only needs to be posted when you are entering that speed limit from another speed limit, which means that if the speed limit has stayed constant, you should know it is 30 mph because that is the speed limit in built up areas. You will never win this argument unless you can prove that the speed limit change had not been advertised. Otherwise, this is an argument that is probably not going to hold up.

Many people challenge the speed cameras, because they say that they were caught by a speed camera and there was no posted sign telling them that they’d be under surveillance by one in the area. However, it important to note that while many police units do let citizens know that a speed camera is in use, it is not the law that they have to. Therefore, they do not need to post that there are going to be speed cameras, and they can catch you speeding if they do. It is important to note that the police have the right to gather evidence in areas where motorists are known to speed, and it is not something that they have to do. Most police units make their speed cameras known and therefore you will know where most of them are, but not all of them do and not all of them will.

Ignorance is not an excuse, and if you suggest that the monitoring vehicle was hidden from view, this will not eb taken as a valid reason for the speeding offence. Although many police play fair and identify the mobile vans used to catch speeders, there is no obligation for them to actually do so, which means that they might catch you without you knowing it.

The court may take into account that the local authority let the signs be covered by foliage, trees or otherwise, although the argument will always likely be that you should know the law. The courts may not agree that the road signs were not in place, and advise you that you should know the speed limits, as stated in the highway code.

To find out more about speeding offences, click here.